Antibiotic use is known to have a near-immediate impact on our gut microbiota and long-term use may leave us drug-resistant and vulnerable to infection. Now there is mounting laboratory evidence that in the increasingly complex, targeted treatment of cancer, judicious use of antibiotics also is needed to ensure these infection fighters don’t have the unintended consequence of also hampering cancer treatment, scientists report.
Any negative impact of antibiotics on cancer treatment appears to go back to the gut and to whether the microbiota is needed to help activate the T cells driving treatment response, says Dr Gang Zhou, Immunologist at the Georgia Cancer Center and the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at the Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University.
"It likely depends on what types of therapy physicians are giving to patients and how often they also are giving them antibiotics," says Dr Zhou.
They have some of the first evidence that in some of the newest therapies, the effect of antibiotics is definitely mixed. Infections are typically the biggest complication of chemotherapy, and antibiotics are commonly prescribed to prevent and treat them.
"We give a lot of medications to prevent infections," says Dr Locke Bryan, haematologist/oncologist at the Georgia Cancer Center and MCG.
"White blood cell counts can go so low that you have no defence against bacteria, and that overwhelming infection can be lethal," says Dr Bryan, a study co-author.
In this high-stakes arena, where chemotherapy is increasingly packaged with newer immunotherapies, Dr Bryan, Dr Zhou and their colleagues have more evidence that antibiotics’ impact on the microbiota can mean that T cells, key players of the immune response, are less effective and some therapies might be too.
They report that antibiotic use appears to have a mixed impact on an emerging immunotherapy called adoptive T-cell therapy, in which a patient’s T cells are altered in a variety of ways to better fight cancer.
They found that one of the newest of these – CAR T-cell therapy – is not affected by antibiotics, likely because it is not so reliant on the innate immune system.
"These infused T cells can pretty much act on their own to kill cancer cells," Dr Zhou says.
With this approach, physicians retrieve T cells from a patient’s blood, engineer them to express a tumour-finding receptor – called chimeric antigen receptor, or CAR – and give them back to the patient. These patients typically will receive a conditioning chemotherapy regimen, which often includes the common agent cyclophosphamide, or CTX, to intentionally wipe out some of their normal T cells and make room for the engineered super-fighters. This emerging treatment is often used in patients who have failed multiple other treatments, including chemotherapy.
Even long-term antibiotic use does not seem to hinder the efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy against systemic lymphoma in their animal model. While they could see the impact of antibiotics on the microbiota, mice with CAR T-cell therapy continued to respond well to cancer treatment.
But the efficacy of another mode of adoptive T-cell therapy was impacted. This model mimics therapy in which receptors that target the patient’s tumour are put into their T cells. In this case, the researchers transferred tumour-specific CD4+T cells to treat mice with colorectal cancer.
One key difference here is that, unlike the CAR T-cell therapy, these engineered T cells still need help from the innate immune system to fight a tumour, now that they can better target it, Dr Zhou says.
Mice with colorectal cancers that did not receive antibiotics were cured after being treated with the chemotherapy CTX followed by CD4+T-cell therapy. However, with antibiotics on board, this curative effect was lost in three out of five mice three weeks after treatment.
Their studies also confirmed that antibiotic use impacts the efficacy of the widely used CTX, when it’s used alone, in this case, to treat...
(All Rights Reserved)